Did you hear about the gunmen running around Oxford Circus in London today? And that people were asked to stay indoors, and some thinking it was a terrorist incident?
No? Well, don't worry because it never happened. It only happened on Twitter, where a lot of people were tweeting about it. It was a case of several layers of misinformation.
So how did it start? Well, if you go over to Exquisite Tweets, they will tell you that it all started with this post from ASOS, promoting a fashion shoot that was about to take place.
Which Exquisite Tweets then claims to have been followed by a long string of people misinterpreting what it was really about (fascination reading).
Note: This is only a very small sample of many thousands of tweets that was actually posted to Twitter.
Much of this was obviously based on misinformation. Nevertheless, some even tried to do it on purpose. The employee from an advertising agency apparently thought it would be fun to move this into the fantasy world.
First she tweeted that she had been told to stay indoors. Later she tweeted to a friend that her colleagues had told her not to post another tweet saying "five people had been shot".
...or just look at tweets like this one.It then turned out that the ASOS tweet, wasn't the cause of this at all. The Metropolitan Police were conducting a training exercise in the area. The information about the misinformation, was misinformed too... hmmm...
Many people point to this as an example of that you cannot trust citizen reporting, and how traditional media did a great of reporting the real facts. E.g. Tom Rayner, Home Affairs Producer for Sky News, did a great job investigating and debunking the story - both on Twitter and in a subsequent article.
What they fail to tell you, is that people themselves are even better at correcting the mistake. If you go to Twitter Search right now, and search for "Oxford Circus", you will find that people are in a frenzy to correct the misinformation.
People are currently doing everything they can to tell their friends that they have nothing to worry about, and that it wasn't real. That is the actual citizen reporting. People might mistakes, but they are quick to correct them too.
We see the same thing every time a celebrity is reported dead on Twitter. There is a short burst of "OH-MY-GOOD he is dead!", followed by an even longer period of "Not true, just a hoax by some idiot".
It is a stream... It sorts out its own mess.
Almost every time a news site launched something new, they also cover the same stories the same way.
Editorial analytics is the tool we use to define how to report the news.
Google wants to build tracking into the browser, and then remove personal identifiers ... but is that good?
AIs can be both good and bad, but using an AI to fake some text is always bad.
Many people in the media wants newspapers to be tax exempt, but what about the rest of the media?
When a publishers says that WhatsApp converts 12 times more people than their website, what does that actually mean?
Facebook said that it wouldn't block misleading political ads, so let's talk about that
Cookies today are doing all kinds of bad things, but did you know that the original creators wanted to stop that?
We all knew this would happen, but Google won't pay publishers for snippets.
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé