Hans Rosling is an absolute hero of mine, because of his amazing work of presenting a 'fact based world-view'. And recently he was on Danish TV where he scolded the media for their continuing focus on only the bad things in life, even when those bad elements represent a tiny part of a much more positive reality.
You can see the video here:
This is such an important message. The media is simply not living up to its role. To give you a simple example. If I say 'Nigeria', do you think of that country as a disaster filled with terror, poverty, Ebola and other bad things? Or do you see a country that is going though a tremendous positive transformation and future potential, filled with amazing people doing amazing things?
And ask yourself, which stories did the press focus on. The ones focusing on all the bad things, which paints the people in a bad light. Or the ones that talk about their amazing future?
Well, let's do a test. I went to one newspaper and searched for 'Nigeria' and these were the highest ranked articles:
You see the problem here? Nigeria does have a number of important problems, but this paints to a picture of a country is chaos, when the reality is the exact opposite. Nigeria is a country of growth.
In fact, if we look at Nigeria's GDP per capita, we see the most amazing transformation.
And if you look at tech world in Nigeria (and indeed in Africa as a whole), what they are doing around mobile is absolutely fascinating.
Granted, Nigeria's living standards are still much lower than in Europe or the US, but that's not the point. The point is what you see in the graph, and all the stories that links to it. And yet, those stories aren't what the media focused on.
Imagine how differently we would look upon the world if the media focused on reporting those stories instead.
This isn't about Africa either.
In US and Europe, we are currently experiencing an increase in people fearing for their own safety, causing virtual security apps to prosper (like this one), and the reason can only be attributed to the media's almost 'reality show'-like focus on all the bad things that happens.
But if you look at the crime data for people being assaulted in the US, you will find that you are 23% safer walking the streets of the US today than 10 years ago. And it's not just for assault. You are 28% less likely to be raped. Your car is 41% less likely to be stolen, and you are 9% less likely to be robbed in your home.
We are creating irrational fear through the media. A level of fear that simply wouldn't exist if the media instead focused on covering crime based on the overall trends.
The world we live in today is much safer than anything we have ever had. But the media insist that everything is going to shit. And our politicians are trying to win votes based on those same fears.
Ask yourself. Is this really the best way to run a newspaper?
Almost every time a news site launched something new, they also cover the same stories the same way.
Editorial analytics is the tool we use to define how to report the news.
Google wants to build tracking into the browser, and then remove personal identifiers ... but is that good?
AIs can be both good and bad, but using an AI to fake some text is always bad.
Many people in the media wants newspapers to be tax exempt, but what about the rest of the media?
When a publishers says that WhatsApp converts 12 times more people than their website, what does that actually mean?
Facebook said that it wouldn't block misleading political ads, so let's talk about that
Cookies today are doing all kinds of bad things, but did you know that the original creators wanted to stop that?
We all knew this would happen, but Google won't pay publishers for snippets.
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé