Sorry, we could not find the combination you entered »
Please enter your email and we will send you an email where you can pick a new password.
Reset password:
 

plus

 
Plus Report - By Thomas Baekdal - April 2011

Social Culture vs. Crossposting Messages

There is nothing wrong with crossposting if it is done based on social culture. But sadly, many companies use it as an excuse.

Last week, I wrote the article "Facebook Deemphasizing Twitter and Brands." In it, I highlighted how Facebook is making it harder for brands to have a social presence on multiple channels.

The short version is that Facebook is making it impossible for brands to use 3rd party applications. You have to manually post every single thing.

After writing that article, several people disagreed that this was a problem. Brands should not be automating or crossposting. They should either use the social channels directly, or stay away. People do not want false connections.

One great example was this comment from a friend of mine, Hans Tosti. He is an excellent guy, teaching people how to use social media every day. And he wrote:

I simply disagree with your article, Thomas.
Crossposting between channels is, sorry to say, lazyness. Brands (and people) who do this underestimate the fact that tone of voice and technical possibilities differs significantly between platforms. On Facebook, text is only 1/3 of what's available in the toolbox. So does the feedback facilities (likes and comments on Fb, retweets and replys on Twitter, etc.)
Of course brands must be on those networks and platforms where they will meet their audience, but it takes some work, and sometimes it's better to focus on one or few platforms and be there 100%.

I completely agree with him - in principle. Each channel has their strengths and weaknesses. You have to embrace each channel separately. This is why I wrote that brands should update Facebook manually.

But I do not agree in practice; or rather, it shouldn't have to be this way. Facebook is making it unnecessarily hard, by refusing to embrace the open social world. What difference does it make how something is posted?

Social is not about how you post, but why and what you post.

 
This 14 page report is exclusive for subscribers. (login)

Try it free for one week

Register to try out Baekdal Plus completely for free for one week.

Subscribe
for just...
$12
MONTH
Subscribe
for just...
$120
YEAR
You get two months for free

 

Baekdal Plus is your premium destination for trends and analysis for the media industry. Every year you get 25 reports about the future media trends, business and editorial strategies, monetization analysis and insights about how to use analytics specifically for publishers.

As a subscriber, you also get full access to all the Plus reports (more than 200) published over the past 8 years, as well as the ability to share what you read.

I'm a company, can we pay via an invoice?

Yes, of course, please write to plus@baekdal.com and I will send you a regular invoice that you can pay via your bank. I will need your company name, address and VAT number (if within the EU). Also, please note that due to this process being manual, this will be for an annual subscription only.

Is there an Enterprise Plan?

Yes, please write to plus@baekdal.com for details. But for 25-99 users: the price is 20% off the subscription price ($79/year per user), 100+ users is a fixed price at $5,000 (for all combined).

Can you create a report just for us?

Yes, please head over to Baekdal Media to read about consulting where I can help you with strategy reviews, trend and strategy reports, and strategic guidance for you media company or a specific publication.

 

 
 
 

The Baekdal Plus Newsletter is the best way to be notified about the latest media reports, but it also comes with extra insights.

Get the newsletter

Thomas Baekdal

Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter

"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made ​​himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé

 

—   thoughts   —

plus

thoughts:
Why publishers who try to innovate always end up doing the same as always

plus

thoughts:
A guide to using editorial analytics to define your newsroom

free

thoughts:
What do I mean when I talk about privacy and tracking?

plus

thoughts:
Let's talk about Google's 'cookie-less' future and why it's bad

free

thoughts:
I'm not impressed by the Guardian's OpenAI GPT-3 article

free

thoughts:
Should media be tax exempt?