I noticed this on Twitter today: "We're closer to a Minority Report reality than people realize"
This is certainly true. We are so close that it's already here and have been so for quite a while, at least for most of it.
There are generally four different future technologies in that movie (with a slew of sub-techs linking to them, but that's not really important).
The first one is the ad tech that is tailored to the individual and is displayed to you as you move around.
In the movie, this tech was based on outdoor displays and other physical things, because smartphones weren't really a thing in 2002. So the movie writers envision a future within the media forms that existed back then.
But in today's world, the personalized ad experience is already here. Look at things like remarketing, personalized email marketing, Facebook ads or Apple Beacon. This is not the future anymore. This is very much the present. It's here, now!
How many times have you seen an ad in an email referring to you by name and offering you products based on your past purchase history? How many times have you seen something on Facebook directly targeted to you?
It's not the future anymore.
The second tech is the display tech. In the movie the lead actor is using this huge multi-gesture display to work. Again, this was before of the age of the smartphone, so the movie script writers didn't realize that the future wouldn't be about desktop computers locked to a specific room. See here:
Today, we have this technology as well, and we have taken that a step further. It's now in our pockets and always ready to be used. We no longer need to go into a room to use a desktop computer with a multitouch screen.
Imagine if the agents in Minority Report had access to cloud based connectivity and mobile displays. Whole scenes of that movie could have been taken out because it was basically about them going from one room to another to use their computer, or having to physically move data between devices.
So, considering that the above quote was told at a media conference to an audience of media people, we are not 'close to a Minority Report reality', we already have it, and we have even taken that a step further in many cases.
One might even say that the way things worked in Minority Report is now mostly out of date (although with extremely fancy and futuristic-looking graphics).
The third tech in Minority Report was the self-driving cars. Now, in this case, it's true that we are only 'close to it'. We are not quite there yet, but it won't be long now before we will have that too.
And then we have the fourth tech, the pre-crime tech. In Minority Report they had the ability to see crime before it happened, with enough of a buffer for them to send out the police to prevent it and to put the person in jail for doing it, before that person actually did it.
Obviously, this tech isn't here... yet. What may surprise you though, is that we are actually getting close to this as well. Pre-crime in today's world is all about data analysis. In jails, for instance, we now have systems that evaluates the probability of someone committing a crime if they are released. Data that is then taken into account when such a prisoner is up for review.
Many police departments use data in many different ways to predict where and when crime is likely to occur, tailoring their work schedule to be in those exact areas during the times with the highest probability for illegal conduct.
And these systems are quite advanced. The current tech can define probability within a 500 by 500 foot area, on a real-time per shift basis.
Of course, a probability doesn't mean a crime would actually happen, nor is it close to the super specific certainty of what we see in Minority Report. But pre-crime tech? It's here too.
So, welcome to the future. You are living in it right now :)
Almost every time a news site launched something new, they also cover the same stories the same way.
Editorial analytics is the tool we use to define how to report the news.
Google wants to build tracking into the browser, and then remove personal identifiers ... but is that good?
AIs can be both good and bad, but using an AI to fake some text is always bad.
Many people in the media wants newspapers to be tax exempt, but what about the rest of the media?
When a publishers says that WhatsApp converts 12 times more people than their website, what does that actually mean?
Facebook said that it wouldn't block misleading political ads, so let's talk about that
Cookies today are doing all kinds of bad things, but did you know that the original creators wanted to stop that?
We all knew this would happen, but Google won't pay publishers for snippets.
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé