Sorry, we could not find the combination you entered »
Please enter your email and we will send you an email where you can pick a new password.
Reset password:
 

plus

 
Plus Report - By Thomas Baekdal - March 2022

Known to work: What makes news relevant, interesting, and useful?

In this 'known-to-work' article, we are going to talk about models that help publishers define relevance, and what makes something relevant to the audience in the first place.

One of the most important models I have ever made is also the simplest of all my models. It's the model that defines the 'Circles of relevance'.

The model itself looks like this:

There is nothing really groundbreaking or eye-opening about it. It's just a good basic model that serves to explain in a simple way the three major elements that define relevance.

I first wrote about this in 2019, and since then, several publishers have used it to help define their focus, and all of them have had a very positive result from it.

The reason why it works so well is because of how you use it. It has two functions. The first function is simply to focus your mindset about what is important and what isn't.

In other words, it serves as a very quick framework that lives inside your brain, and that you refer to every time you talk about a story. So, you quickly ask:

It's very simple, but it's something that publishers often overlook.

And this brings us to the second element, which is 'the audit'. The purpose of the circles of relevance is to give people a way to measure the relevance of a story.

The idea is that you sit down one day and go through the stories you wrote, scoring each one of them, and look at the result.

 
This 29 page report is exclusive for subscribers. (login)

Try it free for one week

Register to try out Baekdal Plus completely for free for one week.

Subscribe
for just...
$12
MONTH
Subscribe
for just...
$120
YEAR
You get two months for free

 

Baekdal Plus is your premium destination for trends and analysis for the media industry. Every year you get 25 reports about the future media trends, business and editorial strategies, monetization analysis and insights about how to use analytics specifically for publishers.

As a subscriber, you also get full access to all the Plus reports (more than 200) published over the past 8 years, as well as the ability to share what you read.

I'm a company, can we pay via an invoice?

Yes, of course, please write to plus@baekdal.com and I will send you a regular invoice that you can pay via your bank. I will need your company name, address and VAT number (if within the EU). Also, please note that due to this process being manual, this will be for an annual subscription only.

Is there an Enterprise Plan?

Yes, please write to plus@baekdal.com for details. But for 25-99 users: the price is 20% off the subscription price ($79/year per user), 100+ users is a fixed price at $5,000 (for all combined).

Can you create a report just for us?

Yes, please head over to Baekdal Media to read about consulting where I can help you with strategy reviews, trend and strategy reports, and strategic guidance for you media company or a specific publication.

 

 
 
 

The Baekdal Plus Newsletter is the best way to be notified about the latest media reports, but it also comes with extra insights.

Get the newsletter

Thomas Baekdal

Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter

"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made ​​himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé

 

—   strategy   —

plus

strategy:
Helping publishers innovate: There is no moon

plus

strategy:
Most publishers get personalization wrong. So what is it?

plus

strategy:
How publishers can get better at the "welcome experience"

plus

strategy:
Known to work: What makes news relevant, interesting, and useful?

plus

strategy:
What creates a successful outcome for publishers?

plus

strategy:
What is the publishing algorithm?