We are now 4% into 2020, many journalists have been at CES discovering smart devices that nobody needs, but outside of that nothing much has changed. So let's do something about it.
Today, I have a number of interesting things for you:
The biggest thing today is my Plus report about entrepreneurial journalism. In this, I explain what entrepreneurial journalism is and how we can think about it, as well as giving you a few examples of what we can do with it.
As I have said a number of times in the past, I consider entrepreneurial journalism to be a very important part of the future of media. The way I look at it is that we will have several separate media industries in the future, and entrepreneurial journalism will define where most of the future of media will go.
It's all very exciting, but take a look at: A guide for how to do entrepreneurial journalism
I also just published another article, and this one is way more controversial. In it, I talk about the prospect and the problem of giving the media a tax exemption.
I have tried to explain this in a nuanced way, but this is something I feel very strongly about. The way media and taxes work today (in many countries) is deeply unfair. For instance, giving print editions a tax exemption, favoring traditional companies, favoring the ownership structure over other things.
I have experienced this first hand. When I write an article, there is often a tax or subsidized difference between whether I publish it directly to you via Baekdal Plus (where I have to pay full taxes), or whether I'm paid to publish it on another site (where they sometimes don't).
How is that fair?
Well, let's talk about that in: Should media be tax exempt?
There is an interesting new study out that looks at how big a share of UK media's audience come from outside the UK ... and the numbers are staggeringly high.
News sites like the Independent and the Guardian both have about a 70% share of their audience being non-UK based, the Telegraph is around 60% and even the very UK-centric, the Sun, gets 45% of their traffic from outside the UK.
What I find really interesting about this isn't how this affects UK newspapers, but more so what it means for the rest of Europe.
You see the reason that UK newspapers can do this is because of the language. By publishing in English, news articles in the Guardian can be read by anyone across the world (including the US), and this dramatically increases their potential market.
But for other European newspapers, they can't do this. If you are a Dutch newspaper, nobody outside the country can read what you write. It's the same in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Poland, Germany, Italy and so forth.
Even within Europe, there is almost no cross-border traffic. A Danish newspaper has almost no readers from Germany, even though we are right next to each other, but many people in Europe come across English or US newspapers every single day.
It's the same with TV shows. At the end of 2019, several magazines published articles like "The best TV shows of 2019". Here, for instance, is an article from the Danish magazine Euroman, and almost all of the TV shows mentioned are English speaking shows produced by UK or US companies.
The language barrier is the most intense limitation facing European media.
I don't have a good solution. When I started Baekdal Plus, my solution was obviously just to write everything in English, but this isn't necessarily the right solution for national newspapers (although I would love a European-focused newspaper, in English, that isn't published from London).
But I want to point this out because, as our world gets more connected and global, breaking out of the language barrier is going to be important.
Finally, how much newspapers can quote from others is an increasingly important topic. In 2019, I had several discussions about this, and more specifically about the problem that every newspaper is publishing the same things.
Whenever one newspaper breaks a story, every other newspaper will write about it too, often adding nothing of their own.
This culture is currently wrecking our industry, and it makes it impossible for any newspaper to stand out.
So, I was thrilled when I heard that the Danish association of newspapers has issued new guidelines for use of content from others.
The new rules are:
Obviously, this only applies to Danish publishers, but this is the kind of discussion we should have globally.
There is one critical thing missing though. For me, the biggest problem with copying is when one newspaper quotes another newspaper in such a way that you no longer have any reason to read the original story.
This of course is a difficult thing, because I'm kind of doing the same here. In my quote above of the new rules in Denmark, you don't really have to visit the link. I already gave you all the information.
But we need to make sure that every article builds on top of what they are quoting, instead of just taking and duplicating the information.
There is nothing wrong with quoting, but the focus of the article must be on what you added.
It's something worth thinking about.
A look at the trend of brand+publisher, and the future for epaper
Asking an AI to do media analyst, and what does it mean when social becomes content focused?
It's tempting to just take a picture of your desk, but be mindful of what it might reveal
A guide to AI for publishers, the end of a million views, and what read metric is best?
Depression is impacting all level of news, from the journalists, the audience, to the businesses.
What happens if we force people to spend time on things at a proportion that is completely insane?
Founder, media analyst, author, and publisher. Follow on Twitter
"Thomas Baekdal is one of Scandinavia's most sought-after experts in the digitization of media companies. He has made himself known for his analysis of how digitization has changed the way we consume media."
Swedish business magazine, Resumé