Pink Edition
We have seen an explosion of multi-touch examples over the last 6-12 months - From pure technical demonstrations, to stunning rich media presentations like Microsoft Surface. But, almost all of them looks and works the same way.
Multi-touch is an incredible progression in interaction design. It allows us to directly manipulate - instead of having to use one device to use another. We no longer have to use a mouse to use a computer, nor use a pen to use a PDA or a mobile phone.
Multi-touch also allow us to mix physical objects with virtual ones. E.g. Microsoft Surface demonstrated how we could get direct feedback from a glass put on a table or share photos directly from your digital camera.

But the problem with most multi-touch concepts is while they look cool, they do not really solve any new problems. Microsoft Surface created something special, not because of the technology (many others had done the same), but because they created a new interaction principle.
This is just some of the capabilities that multi-touch offers you. Your challenge is not to implement them, but to find new and brilliant ways to solve people's problems, create new opportunities, change people's workflow into something extraordinary or invent something that push the boundaries of what we can do.
Just replacing the mouse or pen with a touch-screen does not really change that much. Apple's iPhone is not really that spectacular. It is basically just desktop interaction with your fingers admittedly with a twist).
It is faster in some situations, and it is much more convenient with mobile devices - but it does not solve the fundamental problems with interaction. You constantly have to navigate around an interface, you still have to deal with menus and buttons, and you still struggle with "modes".
Multi-touch allows you to go beyond all that - but you have to think differently than what you are used to. And, multi-touch does not have to be on a table or a mobile phone.
Thomas Baekdal - Sep. 27, 2007
Morgan, I do acknowledge that Microsoft did not invent all of the technology in the surface table, but as far as I know, they did work on concepts before "reactable".
I remember seeing multi-touch concept with physical reach several years ago - at Microsoft Research.
The problem with infrared cameras is, in my opinion, not going to be a problem for long. All it takes is a RFID tag, and three small recievers to solve that problem. Then it would be possible to use physical objects along with devices at any size - including mobile devices.
Morgan Roderick - Sep. 28, 2007
Thomas, reactable was just an example.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-touch
You're probably right about the cameras, well, I would hope so ;-)
If the guys of MS Research have a eureka! moment, i am sure we'll see more tangible products from them that leverage multi-touch surfaces. For me at least, imagination has been limited products or concepts that we've already been exposed to.
One thing that bothers me, is that with touch-surface interaction, there is no tactile feedback, so if you've got impaired vision, or are using your eyes elsewhere, you can't use the device.
P.s. why is the font so small in the comment textarea, when the rest of the site is soo easy to read?
Thomas Baekdal - Sep. 28, 2007
Yes there is a problem with tactile feedback. Several companies are trying to solve that. The latest thing is that some phone companies have developed several ways to vibrate the phone - depending on what you are doing.
I am not sure that is going to solve it though.
Anyway, I wanted to get people to think beyond the technology - find new interactions, instead of focusing on the technical capabilities :)
Published: Sep. 26, 2007
in work notes

Thomas Baekdal is a Writer, Interaction Designer, Change Advocate and Project Manager.
Morgan Roderick - Sep. 27, 2007
Just some minor feedback ... Microsoft didn't really come up with a new interaction principle ... the ideas have been floating around for years, and have seen implementations earlier that the Microsoft Surface. I am sure that the US patent office will grant them some stupid patents, and all innovation will cease up for a few years, while MS battles everyone in the courtrooms :P
http://mtg.upf.edu/reactable/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReacTable
http://www.google.com/search?q=reactable
Yes, the Microsoft Surface sure does look nice ... at least at first glance ... but as far as I understand it, they actually use no less than 3 infrared cameras, to figure out what objects are on the table. And when you think of it, where would you actually use such a table, that has to be stationary and prolly costs a small fortune just to install it?
Multi-touch and surface computing will certainly see some very interesting innovations in the future, and some of them will even be useful.